# 97 Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies
When the language used applies partly to one set of existing facts, and partly to another set of existing facts, but the whole of it does not apply correctly to either, evidence may be given to show to which of the two it was meant to apply.
Illustration
A agrees to sell to B "my land at X in the occupation of Y". A has land at X, but not in the occupation of Y, and he has land in the occupation of Y but it is not at X. Evidence may be given of facts showing which he meant to sell.
Download our fully-offline, High speed android app.- Click here
CHAPTER VI. –– OF THE EXCLUSION OF ORAL BY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
93
Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document94
Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts95
Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts96
Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons98
Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc99
Who may give evidence of agreement varying terms of document100
Saving of provisions of Indian Succession Act relating to willsLawyer's Registry
Click here to register for Lawgist Lawyer's Registry
