# 94 Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts
When language used in a document is plain in itself, and when it applies accurately to existing facts, evidence may not be given to show that it was not meant to apply to such facts.
Illustration
A sells to B, by deed, "my estate at Rampur containing 100 bighas". A has an estate at Rampur containing 100 bighas. Evidence may not be given of the fact that the estate meant to be sold was one situated at a different place and of a different size.
Download our fully-offline, High speed android app.- Click here
CHAPTER VI. –– OF THE EXCLUSION OF ORAL BY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
91
Evidence of terms of contracts, grants and other dispositions of property reduced to form of document92
Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement93
Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document95
Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts96
Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons97
Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies
Lawyer's Registry
Click here to register for Lawgist Lawyer's Registry