# 96 Evidence as to application of language which can apply to one only of several persons
When the facts are such that the language used might have been meant to apply to any one, and could not have been meant to apply to more than one, of several persons or things, evidence may be given of facts which show which of those persons or things it was intended to apply to.
Illustrations
(a) A agrees to sell to B, for Rs. 1,000, "my white horse". A has two white horses. Evidence may be give of facts which show which of them was meant.
(b) A agrees to accompany B to Haidarabad. Evidence may be given of facts showing whether Haidarabad in the Dekkhan or Haiderabad in Sind was meant.
Download our fully-offline, High speed android app.- Click here
CHAPTER VI. –– OF THE EXCLUSION OF ORAL BY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE
92
Exclusion of evidence of oral agreement93
Exclusion of evidence to explain or amend ambiguous document94
Exclusion of evidence against application of document to existing facts95
Evidence as to document unmeaning in reference to existing facts97
Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies98
Evidence as to meaning of illegible characters, etc99
Who may give evidence of agreement varying terms of document
Lawyer's Registry
Click here to register for Lawgist Lawyer's Registry